9/11: Pentagon was attacked to cover-up findings of 2.4 USD trillion missing - 23 Sept. 2007

It is established that there were explosions at the Pentagon minutes prior to the explosion resulting from the flying object (plane and or missile(s) ). Remember that Zov Zakheim had announced that the Pentagon was missing USD $2.4 trillion just the day before the attack (on Sept 10, 2001) and that the explosions, followed by the crash and/or missile strike occurred in the newly refurbished wing of the Pentagon where only the Office of Naval Intelligence (always independent of the CIA) and -- are you ready for this? -- and the Pentagon auditing department had been moved in. I am convinced (following the work of Barbara Honegger) that the perpetrators wanted the auditors and independent investigating body (not under conspirator control) killed -- that they could not be sure that all of the targeted individuals would be present at the moment the "jet crash" was scheduled to take place -- so bombs were set off just prior to the crash at a moment when it had been confirmed by the conspirators that all of the targeted personnel were in the building. The crash then came and covered up the fact of the bombing of auditors. Honegger presents witnesses who walked over dead bodies in the innermost wing of the southwest wedge -- rings A and B -- whereas the "crashing plane" is alleged only to have penetrated as far as the corridor between rings C and B -- recall the famous round "exit hole" in the innermost wall of ring-C.

Furthermore -- it is alleged that the nose of the crashing plane hit at column 14 on the west wall -- the structure between windows is designated as columns -- column 14 being slightly south of the heliport, the numbers of columns increasing as you move south. Column 14 is the only location where there is significant damage on the second floor to even allow the possibility of a 757 fuselage hitting the building. But if the nose hit at column 14 then two significant problems arise. First, given the distance of the engines from the fuselage and the angle of hit, if the nose of the killer jet hit at column 14 and if the killer jet had been a Boeing 757 then the 16th column on the first floor would have had to have been pushed in by the starboard engine. Yet we see that although much of the facial concrete have been blasted away by the explosion the steel rods which reinforced the wall are still there. From this I conclude that the plane or missile that hit at column 14 did not have wing engines. I have, as you must recall from our intermittent correspondence over the years, long suspected that the killer jet was a remote controlled F-16. One witness -- a witness who is the son of an admiral and whose brother is the assistant to an admiral and who maintains that he saw the Boeing approach and hit the Pentagon as he watched from a fourteenth- story apartment south of the crash -- has written that he had been watching news of the WTC attacks -- when they were showing over and over the video of the plane hitting the South Tower -- when he saw an F-16 and a C-130 fly by the Pentagon -- "which got my attention, he says -- and five minutes afterwards he saw the Boeing approaching and crash. Thus one witness places an F-16 in the vicinity near the time of the attack. The F-16 is a plane that had been experimentally rigged with equipment to allow total combat by remote control. This experimental plane had been retired on March of 2001 and sent to the General Dynamics Museum. I suspect that the remote control guidance for this plane or the plane itself or a duplicate set of equipment was used to attack the Pentagon. I suspect an F-16 was used so that in case there was an accident and the F-16 crashed in a visible way, that it could be claimed that this plane was following the jetliner etc. -- but that is speculative -- the F-16 is reasonable speculation -- the fact of a single-engine aircraft or missile is deduction from evidence. We know from the security camera video pictures -- first released on March 2002, and used in Federal court as evidence in the trial of an individual accused of terrorism -- and then officially released by the Pentagon in May of 2006 -- established that the plane the tail fin (vertical stabilizer) of which is visible in the picture is less than half the length of a Boeing 757. The Boeing 757 if 155 ft. the F-16 is about 49 ft. And so that is the first problem with a Boeing 757 hitting at column 14. The second problem with a Boeing 757 nosing into column 14 is the fact that far south between columns 19 and 20 on the second floor there is a hole created by something that penetrated the building. The wing tip of the Boeing could not have made this hole. This is clearly damage caused by a missile fired at a specific target on the second floor of the building. And finally -- there is the effort to conceal this visual evidence of the wrong damage imprint on the west wall -- namely we have a fire truck shooting a curtain of water across the damage preventing cameras from recording the damage (fortunately several good pictures were taken before the water curtain was put there) -- and this fire truck continued this water screen until 10:15 at which time it drove away and everyone was pulled back because, they were all told "a second plane was on its way" -- think how absurd and impossible that is!!!! -- and in the same minute that the fire truck was withdrawn the Pentagon wall collapsed, destroying the visible evidence of the damage imprint. And now for the clincher -- it has been firmly established that that the Boeing 757 that people saw approaching the Pentagon -- flying over the Naval Annex and north of people standing at the Barracks K gas station (Citgo) between the Annex and the Pentagon -- which means that it would have been impossible for that jetliner (in American Airlines livery, whether it was actually "Flight 77" or not is of course not able to be determined) as I was saying the fact that the jetliner passed north of the gas station means that that plane could not have been the flying object that knocked down the lamppost on the southwest corner of the stone bridge on Washington Blvd. (Route 17) which runs next to and parallel to the west wall of the Pentagon -- the jetliner passed Washington Blvd. too far north to have been the killer jet. I was the first investigator to suggest that the Boeing 757 flew over the Pentagon as the killer jet (or missile) struck the building. Indeed many witnesses reported seeing a second plane. One saw two planes approaching "at slightly different angles" one of them "veering off at the last minute." There is much more to say -- but perhaps this is enough to answer your question: No I do not believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. I am certain that missiles were used and bombs -- and MAYBE an F-16.

If you want links to pictures and witness and Barbara Honeggers statements I will provide them.

In friendship,

XXXX   XXXXXXX
Yakima, Washington